Certified - CompTIA Server+

Server monitoring is one of the most essential responsibilities in system administration. It ensures that servers are not only online but also performing efficiently and securely. Monitoring allows administrators to detect early signs of hardware failure, capacity limits, or suspicious activity. Without monitoring, problems are often discovered only after users are affected. The Server Plus certification includes configuring, reviewing, and interpreting monitoring tools and their outputs.
Proactive monitoring delivers clear operational advantages. It helps detect problems before they result in outages, allowing administrators to take action before service is disrupted. Performance data helps tune systems, plan for upgrades, and document compliance. Monitoring must not rely on occasional manual checks. Instead, it should be automated, logged, and integrated with alert systems so that problems are caught and escalated without delay.
Every server should be monitored for core metrics. These include central processing unit usage, memory utilization, disk input output operations per second, and network throughput. High usage is not always a problem by itself. What matters is when usage exceeds expected levels for extended periods. Administrators must set thresholds that reflect each server’s workload and baseline behavior. Sustained anomalies, not isolated spikes, are often signs of real problems.
Logs provide detailed records of server events and behavior. These logs come in different types. System logs record operating system events. Application logs track software errors and warnings. Security logs document authentication attempts and policy enforcement. Service-specific logs capture details unique to services like web servers or databases. Server Plus includes collecting and managing logs across both Windows Event Viewer and Linux syslog facilities.
Monitoring tools come in many forms. On Windows systems, administrators may use Performance Monitor, Resource Monitor, or Task Manager. On Linux systems, tools like top, htop, and journalctl are common. Visual dashboards provide summaries and make it easier to detect trends. Command-line interfaces support scripting, automation, and remote access. Choosing the right interface depends on the environment and the administrator’s workflow.
Simple Network Management Protocol allows remote monitoring of servers using a standard protocol. SNMP agents run on each device and respond to queries with information about metrics and status. Agent-based monitoring tools collect more detailed, operating system-level data and often support scripts or plugins. Server Plus includes enabling SNMP version three, which provides encrypted communication and authentication for secure monitoring over the network.
Thresholds define the conditions that trigger alerts. These may be static, like disk usage exceeding ninety percent, or dynamic, based on deviations from baseline. Examples include high central processing unit usage, excessive memory swapping, or sudden drops in network throughput. It is important to define thresholds carefully to avoid false positives. Alerts should reflect real problems that require action, not routine fluctuations in usage.
Alerts must be actionable. An alert that simply says “failure” is not helpful. Good alerts identify the system, describe the issue, provide a timestamp, and suggest what action is needed. For example, “Web server disk usage exceeds ninety percent on drive C at 3:41 p.m. Consider cleaning logs.” Alerts should also integrate with ticketing systems, dashboards, or chat tools so that support teams can respond promptly and track resolution steps.
Notification channels determine how alerts reach responsible parties. Email is common, but administrators may also use text messages, dashboard pop-ups, or mobile apps. Alerts must be prioritized to prevent overload. Not every warning deserves immediate action. Escalation policies define who responds, how quickly, and in what order. This prevents alert fatigue and ensures the right people respond to critical incidents at the right time.
Monitoring should include security-related events in addition to performance metrics. Track failed login attempts, privilege escalations, and changes to key configuration files. Monitor for unusual outbound traffic, especially from sensitive servers. Security logs should be correlated with firewall data, antivirus events, and intrusion detection systems. Server Plus includes security monitoring as an essential layer of server defense, not a separate process.
Centralized log collection simplifies analysis and compliance. Tools like Graylog, the Elastic Stack, or Windows Event Forwarding aggregate logs from multiple systems into one searchable repository. This enables faster detection of patterns, long-term retention, and forensic analysis after incidents. Central log collection also reduces the need to log into multiple systems during investigations or audits and helps ensure that logs are not altered or lost.
For more cyber related content and books, please check out cyber author dot me. Also, there are other prepcasts on Cybersecurity and more at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.
Performance baselines are essential to understanding what is normal for a given server. Administrators should measure key metrics under typical load and use this data as a reference. Baselines allow comparison after changes such as software updates or role additions. They also help detect anomalies that signal degraded performance or hidden failures. Without a baseline, there is no way to distinguish between acceptable variation and a serious problem in progress.
Real-time monitoring provides immediate visibility into server state. It shows current resource utilization, live process lists, and active network connections. Historical monitoring provides long-term insight into patterns and trends. Together, they allow administrators to detect performance regressions, forecast capacity needs, and conduct root cause analysis. Retention periods for historical data should match regulatory requirements and support security investigations or performance reviews.
Monitoring infrastructure must itself be designed for high availability. If the monitoring server fails, all visibility into the network is lost. Redundant collectors, failover configurations, or cloud-integrated solutions ensure that monitoring continues during outages. Critical alerts must still be delivered even if the primary dashboard is unavailable. Monitoring should be treated as a production system with its own disaster recovery and failover planning.
Virtual and cloud-based servers require specialized monitoring tools. Hypervisors may provide insights into guest system performance, but host and guest metrics are not always aligned. Cloud providers offer APIs for collecting metrics, but these may differ from on-premises tools. Administrators must validate what data is available, whether it includes guest operating system logs, and how alerts are generated across platforms. Server Plus includes adapting monitoring strategies to virtualized and hybrid environments.
Automated remediation links specific alerts to predefined responses. For example, if a service crashes, a script may restart it. If a disk is full, logs may be cleared or volumes expanded. This automation prevents downtime caused by common, recoverable errors. Scripts must be tested carefully to avoid unintended consequences. Automated responses should be logged and must not replace human oversight, especially for high-impact events.
Compliance policies often require monitoring data to be retained for a specific duration. Common retention periods range from thirty to ninety days, depending on regulation and audit requirements. Audit trails must be complete and immutable, showing when and how systems were accessed or modified. Access to monitoring systems must also be controlled, ensuring only authorized personnel can view sensitive logs or alert history. These practices support both operational and legal accountability.
Reporting consolidates monitoring data into digestible summaries. Daily reports may include uptime statistics. Weekly reports may track system load, disk usage, or active alerts. Monthly reports are used for trend analysis, capacity forecasting, and audit review. Reports should be reviewed during team meetings, support planning sessions, and budget reviews. Documentation of historical performance strengthens decisions around upgrades and system retirement.
Monitoring is a continuous, foundational discipline that supports every other domain of server administration. From performance optimization to security enforcement, monitoring reveals what is working and what is not. It transforms raw activity into actionable information. A well-structured monitoring system reduces downtime, increases visibility, and supports compliance. In the next episode, we will discuss data migration strategies and tools, including how to safely transfer data between storage, systems, and environments.